What makes customers rate an AI voice bot well? A practical reading of Dayan (2026)

For companies running AI voice bots in customer service: the overall quality impression of the agent is the strongest predictor of overall service quality, according to a survey of 295 users published in JTAER (Scopus Q1).

Dayan, O. (2026). One voice, one impression: Why customers perceive the service quality of AI voice bots holistically and what it means for electronic commerce. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 21(10), 363. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer21100363

In brief

Dayan (2026) found that customers judge an AI voice bot as one overall impression, and that this perceived quality is the strongest predictor of how they rate the service overall. Part of the effect runs through perceived usefulness. Interaction complexity showed no significant moderating or predictive effect.

One impression drives the rating

Customers can distinguish the facets of a voice bot's quality, yet their overall impression carries most of the weight. In the study, perceived quality was the strongest predictor of overall service quality.

Usefulness is part of the path

The effect of perceived quality on overall service quality runs directly and partly through perceived usefulness, so customers who see the bot as useful rate the service higher.

What this means for managers

Design and evaluate the voice bot as one experience. Invest in the overall quality impression of the agent. Communicate usefulness clearly.

Questions researchers ask

What drives customer satisfaction with AI voice bots in customer service?

In Dayan (2026, JTAER), the overall perceived quality of the voice bot is the strongest predictor of overall service quality, directly and partly through perceived usefulness.

Does a more complex request make customers judge a voice bot more harshly?

Dayan (2026) found no significant moderating or predictive effect of interaction complexity.

How should companies evaluate their voice bot's service quality?

Dayan (2026) supports evaluating the voice bot as one overall experience, since customers form a unified impression of the agent.

How to cite

Dayan, O. (2026). One voice, one impression: Why customers perceive the service quality of AI voice bots holistically and what it means for electronic commerce. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 21(10), 363. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer21100363

Read the full research summary

Related

References

Dayan, O. (2026). One voice, one impression: Why customers perceive the service quality of AI voice bots holistically and what it means for electronic commerce. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 21(10), 363. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer21100363